A vendor scorecard that generates scores without consequences is a compliance document, not a management tool. This post outlines how mid-market organizations can redesign their supplier performance programs — from KPI selection and measurement cadence to consequence tiers and joint improvement planning — to drive actual supplier behaviour change rather than documentation.
Most mid-market procurement functions are built to process transactions efficiently, not to architect supplier relationships strategically — and that distinction is worth millions in recoverable cost. This post defines the operational difference between tactical procurement and strategic sourcing, covers category segmentation using the Kraljic Matrix, and provides a practical 12-month sequencing for teams ready to make the transition.
The annual planning process at most mid-market organizations follows a budget-first sequence that disconnects strategy from resource allocation and produces a plan nobody follows past February. High-growth companies plan differently: they establish strategic clarity before any numbers are built, cascade OKRs as a translation mechanism, and maintain the plan through a structured governance cadence. This post breaks down the structural failure modes and the specific steps to fix them.
Most quarterly business reviews are designed as reporting rituals rather than decision forums — which is why the same issues appear on three consecutive agendas without resolution. This post outlines a structural redesign of the QBR format, covering pre-read discipline, diagnosis-first agenda sequencing, owner accountability mechanics, and the mid-quarter checkpoint cadence that prevents item recurrence.
Mid-market leadership teams typically know what uncertainties keep them up at night — but most annual planning cycles default to a single-point forecast that becomes fiction within six months. This post provides a four-scenario planning framework, built around your two highest-uncertainty variables, that any leadership team can execute without a specialist economist — and that integrates directly into capital allocation, hiring plans, and board reporting.
Most mid-market leadership teams leave their annual strategy day with a polished deck and return to work to find that none of it gets acted on. The problem is structural: a slide deck records conversation; it does not produce decisions. This post walks through the pre-work requirements, agenda architecture, decision facilitation techniques, and 30-day follow-up process needed to run a strategy day that actually results in committed action.
OKRs and KPIs are not interchangeable — and treating them as though they are is the most common reason performance management frameworks collapse within two years of launch. This post provides a precise, practical framework for running both in parallel: separate cadences, separate owners, and an explicit connection layer that ties strategic direction to operational health monitoring.
Most business transformation programmes are measured on the wrong things — go-lives, training completions, and steering committee approvals. This post presents a three-tier KPI framework covering adoption metrics, process performance metrics, and financial benefit metrics, along with the measurement cadence and governance structures mid-market companies need to hold benefits realization accountable after the programme closes.
The first 100 days after close determine whether a merger delivers its intended value or begins a slow erosion of talent, customer confidence, and operational performance. This playbook covers day-one readiness, governance structure, workstream design, quick-win sequencing, and the communication architecture that prevents talent flight in mid-market integrations.
ERP selection processes are typically structured backwards — organizations spend months evaluating features and days reviewing contracts, which is precisely backwards from what determines project success. This post provides a structured framework for evaluating vendors on the dimensions that actually predict outcomes: total cost of ownership, implementation partner accountability, customization governance, integration architecture, and reference quality at comparable scale, including a scoring template for making vendor responses comparable.
Practical thinking on project management, AI, and business transformation — straight to your inbox when we publish.
Or follow us on LinkedIn:
Follow StrategyPeeps on LinkedInNo spam. Unsubscribe any time.